Journal article
Julie Maier, K. Jozkowski, María S. Montenegro, Malachi Willis, R. Turner, Brandon L. Crawford, Wen-Juo Lo
Health Behavior and Policy Review, 2021
Health Behavior and Policy Review, 2021
Semantic Scholar
DOI
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Maier, J., Jozkowski, K., Montenegro, M. S., Willis, M., Turner, R., Crawford, B. L., & Lo, W.-J. (2021). Examining Auxiliary Verbs in a Salient Belief Elicitation. Health Behavior and Policy Review.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Maier, Julie, K. Jozkowski, María S. Montenegro, Malachi Willis, R. Turner, Brandon L. Crawford, and Wen-Juo Lo. “Examining Auxiliary Verbs in a Salient Belief Elicitation.” Health Behavior and Policy Review (2021).
MLA
Click to copy
Maier, Julie, et al. “Examining Auxiliary Verbs in a Salient Belief Elicitation.” Health Behavior and Policy Review, 2021.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{julie2021a,
title = {Examining Auxiliary Verbs in a Salient Belief Elicitation},
year = {2021},
journal = {Health Behavior and Policy Review},
author = {Maier, Julie and Jozkowski, K. and Montenegro, María S. and Willis, Malachi and Turner, R. and Crawford, Brandon L. and Lo, Wen-Juo}
}
Abstract
Objective: Salient belief elicitations (SBEs) measure beliefs toward a health behavior through open-ended questions, with the purpose of developing close-ended survey questions. Auxiliary verbs used in SBE questions often differ (eg, What are the top 3 reasons you would/should decide to have an abortion?). We tested how 2 auxiliary verbs function in a SBE assessing abortion in English and Spanish: would/decidíra and should/debería.
Methods: We administered a SBE survey online (N = 175) and in-person (N = 72); in-person participants also participated in cognitive interviews to assess question interpretation. Participants were assigned to survey versions that included identical SBE questions aside from auxiliary verbs—would/decidíra versus should/debería. Data analysis included: (1) content analysis of survey responses to assess differences in responses by version and (2) thematic analysis of interview data focused on interpretations of would/decidíra and should/ debería.
Results: Would/decidíra surveys generated more response categories. Similarly, cognitive interview findings suggest participants conceptualized would/decidíra as allowing for more options, while should/debería was thought to include only the most significant reasons/circumstances for abortion, potentially restricting participants’ responses.
Conclusion: These findings have important measurement implications for researchers administering SBEs